|
|
 Richard C. Klein, Esq.
| Attorney Richard C. Klein Featured on Executive Leaders Radio
Livingston, N.J., January 27, 2012 – Becker Meisel Partner and Family Law Department Chair Richard C. Klein was recently featured on an episode of Executive Leaders Radio. During the interview, Mr. Klein discusses Becker Meisel and the qualities that distinguish the firm and reveals details about his own professional journey and the influence of his personal life on his professional endeavors. The interview can be heard at http://executiveleadersradio.com/klein-richard-2939.aspx.
|
 Wes Bridges, Esq.
|
Attorney Wes Bridges Joins Becker Meisel
Cherry Hill, N.J., January 24, 2012– The law firm of Becker Meisel has announced the addition of attorney Wes Bridges, as partner, practicing in the firm’s Cherry Hill office, focusing his practice on matters involving employment law and complex commercial litigation. Mr. Bridges is a recognized authority in employment law and has a vast amount of experience representing Fortune 500 and Fortune 100 companies in state and federal court, successfully representing corporate clients in cases involving discrimination, sexual harassment, the enforcement and interpretation of operating agreements and executive compensation packages, as well as prosecuting and enforcing non-competes and restrictive covenants. More...
|
 Kenneth D. Roth, Esq.
|
Real Estate Practice News
Condominium/Homeowner’s Associations and Alternate Dispute Resolution, by Kenneth Roth
Livingston, N.J., January 17, 2012 – On January 12, 2012, an opinion of the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division was approved for publication, meaning the decision will have statewide impact. The case is entitled, Bell Tower Condominium v. Pat Haffert, et al.
The facts of the case are simple. The Plaintiff is a condominium association consisting of five units in Sea Isle City, New Jersey. The common areas of the condominium required extensive repairs and replacements, and the association had not set aside a reserve for this work. At a meeting of the Board of Trustees, four of the five elected board members were present, and at that time, approved a special assessment of $80,000.00 to make the necessary repairs. Four of the five units were assessed at $14,400.00, and the Defendants, owning the largest unit, were assessed at $22,400.00. The Defendants refused to pay the special assessment claiming that the Board failed to follow proper procedures and that they had concerns about how the money would be allocated for the repairs. More...
To view the opinion, click here.
|
|
|
|
